20 Comments
Jan 7Liked by Eric Flaningam

The go-to-primer for investors willing to understand how the top players operate across the value chain.

Impressive work, Eric. Thank you for sharing and for the mention!

Expand full comment
author

Thank you my friend!

Expand full comment
Mar 9Liked by Eric Flaningam

Nice post with good summary

Expand full comment
Mar 2Liked by Eric Flaningam

Really nice one Eric. Thanks so much!

Expand full comment
author

Thanks AJ!

Expand full comment

Love this article. The big question is. Who will lead the M&A game? Thoughts?

Expand full comment
author

Thank you! The hyperscalers are so well positioned that it's hard to not see them leading in M&A. The caveat would be if regulators block Data & AI acquisitions because they're concerned about anti-competitive practices.

Secondly, the data providers that are aggressively expanding into data platforms such as Snowflake, Databricks, and Datadog are likely to pursue a lot of M&A. What are your thoughts on it?

Expand full comment

That’s a good question. It depends on what the driver for a M&A is. In my last job we always said. You either do it because you have to much money, or want a strategic benefit from it. Or you are not innovative enough and what do grow that way. The first two are a good sign. The last one is screaming for help. So essentially you need to be the fly on the wall to answer it confidently. :-)

Expand full comment
author

Great way to think about it!

Expand full comment
Jan 8Liked by Eric Flaningam

Great work Eric, really enjoyed the clear overview and writing 👌👍

Expand full comment
author

Thank you Stephan!

Expand full comment

Great work on this—the box of rocks that occupies the space between my ears could only fully comprehend about 25% of it, but I can still appreciate how thorough it was.

Do you think quantum computing will play a role in this space? So-called "quantum supremacy" still seems far off, but it seems like it could revolutionize this space if the stars align

Expand full comment
author

Thanks Jon, certainly a complex space. Quantum is interesting, I think I’ll write a primer on it in the future. At this point, I haven’t studied it enough to give any real insight. Stay tuned.

Expand full comment

Amazing article! Wondering if you could expand on the relationship between database systems (e.g. MongoDB, Oracle, etc) and data warehouses/lakes (e.g. snowflake, databricks, etc). My understanding is that both are used for data storage, with the latter more for longer-term storage & analytical purposes (with databases commonly being a source of data ingested). Is this correct?

Expand full comment
author
Mar 7·edited Mar 7Author

That's a pretty good way to summarize it. The first thing to call out is that there is some overlap depending on a company's specific architecture. Generally, databases are used for transactional workloads (inputting, updating, pulling data) for a specific application. Data warehouses are used for analytics, and generally store a wider set of data across a company.

Expand full comment

Great primer Eric and thank you for highlighting my work on Datadog

Expand full comment
author

Thank you! And happy to share, it’s great work

Expand full comment

Great piece. Thx!

Expand full comment

This is very helpfull to me, in my journey to understand the different sectors I invest in. It's mesmerising how vast the data space is, you managed to create a good overview accompanied by good info graphics.

Thank you for sharing all this information 🙏

I'm looking forward to read more of your articles!

Expand full comment
author

Thanks Robin!

Expand full comment